<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cram down legislation is likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afterthebust.com/government/cram-down-legislation-is-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afterthebust.com/government/cram-down-legislation-is-likely/</link>
	<description>Looking to the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: annerenz</title>
		<link>http://www.afterthebust.com/government/cram-down-legislation-is-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>annerenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afterthebust.com/?p=12#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I agree also. It may good for people that are really in bankruptcy.  They would have the chance to make their things very responsible and an opportunity to lighten up their shadows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree also. It may good for people that are really in bankruptcy.  They would have the chance to make their things very responsible and an opportunity to lighten up their shadows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.afterthebust.com/government/cram-down-legislation-is-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afterthebust.com/?p=12#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I agree it would be a good thing to the extent that it keeps people in their homes. I&#039;d also expect it would have a positive trickle-down effect on the businesses providing the products associated with home ownership, like perhaps building supplies, for example. 

I assume these households would still purchase supplies for a significant amount of routine home maintenance, if not elective renovations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it would be a good thing to the extent that it keeps people in their homes. I&#8217;d also expect it would have a positive trickle-down effect on the businesses providing the products associated with home ownership, like perhaps building supplies, for example. </p>
<p>I assume these households would still purchase supplies for a significant amount of routine home maintenance, if not elective renovations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
