After the Bust

I know that a book could be writting on this subject, and it is not my intent to write one.  There are a number of thing that most people can do to increase their energy savings through lowered consumption.  Some of them are just common sense, and sure you will say “everyone knows that,” while there are a few other suggestions that you may not have thought of.  Here’s a quick list:

1.  Take time to plan your trips, make sure that your routes are the ones that are the shortest and most efficeint.  How many of us think we know a way to get somewhere that is shorter but we have never taken a look online to confirm whether or not it really is?

2. If you can, pay the extra dollars necessary to acquire high efficiency equipment like A/C and heating units.  While you pay a premium for the equipment, most units will save you big over the life of the equipment, especially since energy costs continue to rise.

3. Make an adjustment to your heating or cooling habits, you can work and live in a comfort zone without being in an excessive cost zone.  If you are in the heat of the desert maybe you can live with 75 degrees instead of 70 degrees.  Over an entire summer if you are cooling or heating a 2,000 square foot home the savings can be substantial.  Something as simple as a fan or ceiling fan can make an effective 5 degree difference in cooling or direct heat back down to you before it escapes the room.

4. In keeping with the above, upgarde your thermostat and set it to use less energy when your are gone to work.  You can save the money that the upgraded thermostat costs you in a short time.

5. Shorten the time that your pool cleaning system runs and consider off-peak times to run motors for such purposes.

 6. Cut back on decorative landscaping that is expensive to keep in place.  Do you really need to have acres of decorative grass that requires hundreds or thousands of gallons of fresh water pumped to it for aesthetics? 

7. Unplug electronics or applicances that stay in a ”standby” mode and continue to use power.

8. Incandescent lights use more energy because they create a lot of heat.  While there are still negative feature, fluorescent lights offer a substantial savings. 

9. Check to see if you can get a tax credit for making changes.  Many utility companies offer rebates for making landscaping, thermostat or light bulb changes.  Expect the feds to participate more with major alternative energy credits for solar and other sources.

What about recycling, building ”green” and home tune-ups?  All great ideas, it takes some effort, but with energy bills potentially going through the roof everyone needs to take some time and evaluate their consumption situation.

Popularity: 9% [?]

Ok, now I understand why this healh care plan is going to be so expensive.  12 million foriegn aliens are going to get free coverage, yes, that makes sense.  If we buy some additional printing presses the U.S. Mint can run the ones that we already have and the new ones faster, and we can print enough money to cover everyone with health insurance in both North and South America.  Why not?  It’s a great idea.  Talk about good international relations!

I guess not guarding the borders well will now be a whole lot more expensive than it used to be.  For every undocumented alien who gets into the U.S., the health care cost will just keep on going up.  I have to say that if I were thinking about moving back to the U.S. given the proposed coverage I would do it for that alone.

It used to be that being a citizen of the U.S. meant something, but I guess that now it does not.  I can hardly wait to hear what happens when they turn away veterans and people who are paying massive taxes because the services are being soaked up by those who are here illegally.  That should turn out to be an interesting sight.

I don’t know about you, but I think this is a terrible proposal that has been added to the plan.  Health care coverage was never supposed to be about taking care of everyone, it was about taking care of U.S. citizens who could not afford coverage.  If we do not know who is a citizen, that is a failure that must be fixed before we move forward.

Popularity: 8% [?]

If you are trying to follow where we are in the real estate cycle you may want to check out “The Big Picture” at www.ritholtz.com and specifically read the recent post on the blog at http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/why-housing-isnt-yet-bottoming/ it has some great arguments about why we are still headed down.  Sadly, I agree with his assessment.  He published the following chart on his site which dramatically displays just how bad things are historically:

As discussed on this site within other posts, there are some who believe that we will not turn around this mess without having housing prices stabilize and turn back up.  There are just too many people who will continue to hit deep negative equity water and dump more real estate onto the market.

I really don’t expect to see prices continue to drop at 32% or more per year, which has been the case here in Las Vegas.  The prices are likely to continue to decrease in price at a decreasing rate.  Las Vegas, unlike many other cities, is adjusting quickly to price drops and my expectation is that we will hit the bottom sooner than many others.  That could occur when home prices find their way below the cost of construction or below their expected or forecasted value based on historic trends.

At some point the psychological aspect of the housing market will change, and assuming credit is available, there will be more people willing to consider a purchase.  The fact that things have fallen so far is of course going to stigmatize the entire market for quite a while. 

When will it happen?  That’s the trillion dollar question that no one can answer.  In Las Vegas we are already seeing many properties sell below what it would cost to construct them.  When you get to about $ 70 per square foot for an average home here, you are near or below the cost of construction (which includes the lot and site improvements).

Popularity: 6% [?]

The unemployment rate in Nevada hit 12.3% the other day and I have read that it is at or near 15% in Michigan.  Nationally we have hit a 50 year unemployment high that is climbing, and there are nearly a million and a half people not counted as unemployed because they haven’t searched recently for work.

When you consider the fact that the unemployed are staying that way for a longer and longer period, you can begin to understand why polls are saying that there is an “erosion of confidence” in our economic system. 

The problem is that there are no real signs that things are turning around.  The Press wants to jump on anything.  If a dog barks, or home prices stabilize in Beverly Hills, it must be an economic recovery.  In reality things are likely to get worse in 2009 with continued housing market problems and a new wave of commercial defaults and foreclosures coming our way.

No one really knows if 2010 will end this down market or if it will take much longer.  Real estate cycles can last decades.  In Las Vegas we have been told that there is a 5 year supply of commercial buildings, condos and homes that will have to be absorbed in order for us to return to normal.  Unless we see a mass exodus from California, which is not entirely unrealistic, it will take much longer than most people are willing to admit.

I’m not trying to be negative here, just report some dire information about our economy and the direction in which it is headed.  I am looking forward to the time when things get better, but it appears that we have to prepare for more pain not less.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Have you ever started to wonder what is going to happen to our health care system if one of these proposed plans ever reaches the light of day?  Pundits say it is “impossible” for the proposed plans to cause the termination of Medicare because it is “so popular.”  There is, however, no way to float a national health care system without destroying anything that is good about the one we have. 

It will be some trick if a  government sponsored national health care plan manages to survive without creating massive supply and demand distortions.  I’m still trying to figure out how my doctor, who I struggle to see when I need him, is going to take on twice as many patients as he now has and still provide me with a valuable service.  Most of the time I currently see his Physician’s Assistant or his Nurse, so if he doubles his load I will only bee seeing a medical tech of some kind.  I might as well just buy a good medical book.

I am also interested in knowing why my employer would be willing to continue to pay for my somewhat expensive health care coverage when he knows that I could at any time go on a much cheaper federal plan. 

As I have noted on this blog in the past, I’m not totally against changing the system that now exists.  I think the system is not being run in our best interest, how can it be when it is a puppet that belongs to big insurance companies?  Health care is one of those sacred areas where capitalism just shouldn’t be.  Do we need to make a buck on everything?  Years ago society left health care to health care providers.  Now it is run like a consulting business and you will find that, unless you are wealthy, you simply can’t afford those top shelf services that you may absolutely need.

A restructuring of the health care system is relatively easy.  Fix prices for services, and have the prices associated with hard costs . . not associated with lost profits as they are today.  Get the insurance companies out of the health care industry once and for all, but don’t substitute the government, that’s crazy.

Popularity: 6% [?]

The Wall Street Journal had an interesting article today authored by Stan Leibowitz entitled  New Evidence on the Foreclosure Crisis

it’s an eye opener because the article identifies negative equity as the main cause for mortgage foreclosure, not mortgage rate changes or unemployment, which many thought were the reasons. 

It is important to understand that foreclosure are happening because people are finding themselves in debt holes that are so deep that it would take them decades to get out of them, and rather than spend every dollar that they earn trying to make it right (pay it back), people are just walking away.

I imagined that most of the defaults were being made by individuals who were being forced into foreclosure because they could not make their mortgage payments, but negative equity foreclosures are made by people to proactively elect to default.  They are simply trying to better their financial situation.

I can identify with people who don’t want to be straddled with hundreds of thousands of dollars of mortgage debt.  It was fun buying the Mercedes and touring Europe, but when property values dropped and you find that you have to pay it all back, that is just downright brutal, right? 

Based on this new found knowledge, I will again speculate that the American people will elect to default on their large mult-trillion dollar debt in the next several years rather than pay for it via huge tax increases.  California is effectively defaulting its 24 billion budget shortfall via its I.O.U. program.  They should be starting from scratch with a zero based budget, and kill progarms that they just can’t afford, but in the American tradition they would rather default that accept the fact that they simply could not afford them.

Popularity: 8% [?]

I still do some business, but I’m not as active as I once was before the “bust.”  What I have seen in my limited sampling of the business world is a dramatic increase in slow pay no pay situations.  It seems like the guys who used to pay in 10 days are now paying their bills out at 45 days and the guys who did net 30 payments are paying in 90 days.  That affects me a bit, but I don’t have a huge number of invoices outstanding at any given time. 

The slow pay trend must be having a nasty impact on larger businesses with many outstanding  invoices.  If many companies are delaying their payments I could see how a slow pay trend could cause a great deal of pain.  This is kind of back to the “house of cards” argument that I talked about in some other posts on this site.  If enough companies start doing delayed payments, its could very well crash others by destroying their cash flow.

I guess that slow pay is better than “I.O.U. pay” that is planned, and may have started, in California.  Myu problem with their plan is that I can’t eat an I.O.U. and I can’t pay my grocery bill or power bill with an I.O.U. either.  I’m interested in seeing how the open market discounts California I.O.U.’s if they hit the street.  California gives you a paycheck for $ 3,000 and you sell the paper for what, fifty cents on the dollar?  Whatever the discount turns out to be, the people who receive them will still have to peddle the paper to buy groceries.

For all of the money that has been dumped into the economy of late by the government I’m not yet seeing a lot of it in circulation.  As discussed on this site, there is a lot of bank hoarding and investor hoarding of dollars.  I still think that it is just a matter of time and all of that money will start to chase hard assets.  We shall see.

Popularity: 10% [?]